[PRE REVIEW]: MetObs - a Python toolkit for using non-traditional meteorological observations

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @vergauwenthomas (Thomas Vergauwen)
Repository: https://github.com/vergauwenthomas/MetObs_toolkit
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper
Version: v0.1.1
Editor: @hugoledoux
Reviewers: @ashwinvis, @Zeitsperre
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ffa3a79315bdf4c4793992a1de41193d"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ffa3a79315bdf4c4793992a1de41193d/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ffa3a79315bdf4c4793992a1de41193d/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/ffa3a79315bdf4c4793992a1de41193d)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @vergauwenthomas. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@vergauwenthomas if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.16 s (469.0 files/s, 115109.1 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                      files          blank        comment           code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           45           3924           4372           7755
YAML                              6             11             15            557
reStructuredText                 11            297            344            291
TeX                               1             17              0            200
Markdown                          2             28              0             93
Bourne Shell                      2             44             15             67
TOML                              1              7              0             28
DOS Batch                         1              8              1             26
JSON                              3              1              0             19
make                              1              4              7              9
Bourne Again Shell                1             13              2              6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             74           4354           4756           9051
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5194/asr-17-153-2020 is OK
- 10.3389/fenvs.2021.720747 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7254221 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7794821 is OK
- 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3946761 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.6364594 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100565 may be a valid DOI for title: The urban climate of Ghent, Belgium : a case study combining a high-accuracy monitoring network with numerical simulations

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2017.01.006 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4210 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1071

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kthyng]

Hi @vergauwenthomas and thanks for your submission. I saw your note about having hugoledoux as your editor. I'm not pinging them at the moment since they are out of office but we can starting around Sept 11. In the meantime check out the DOI notes above and fix those as needed.

[kthyng]

Oh also please list 5 potential reviewers but without pinging them with "@"

[vergauwenthomas]

Oh also please list 5 potential reviewers but without pinging them with "@"

Hi @kthyng, here I list 5 potential reviewers (based on the topic):

• hugoledoux
• pdebuyl
• martinfleis
• dhhagan
• observingClouds

[kthyng]

@vergauwenthomas Actually those are all editors here at JOSS. Please take a look for reviewers here: https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/lookup (some editors are probably listed there too).

[kthyng]

I need to add this to our waitlist to wait for an appropriate editor. Thanks for your patience.

[kthyng]

@editorialbot assign @hugoledoux as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @hugoledoux is now the editor

[vergauwenthomas]

@vergauwenthomas Actually those are all editors here at JOSS. Please take a look for reviewers here: https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/lookup (some editors are probably listed there too).

Here I list 5 potential reviewers, based on topic areas and code language:

• Kanishkan91
• Zeitsperre
• malmans2
• nehakn
• eviatarbach

If the editor (@hugoledoux ) wants to assign other reviewers he is free to do so.

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot add @ashwinvis as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@ashwinvis added to the reviewers list!

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot add @Zeitsperre as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@Zeitsperre added to the reviewers list!

[hugoledoux]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5916.