[PRE REVIEW]: The Spreadsheet Energy System Model Generator (SESMG): A tool for the optimization of urban energy systems

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @chrklemm (Christian Klemm)
Repository: https://github.com/SESMG/SESMG
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.5.0
Editor: @timtroendle
Reviewers: @nick-gorman, @willu47
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/377ee4d8f3dfa756cdf6def4be55ab8b"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/377ee4d8f3dfa756cdf6def4be55ab8b/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/377ee4d8f3dfa756cdf6def4be55ab8b/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/377ee4d8f3dfa756cdf6def4be55ab8b)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @chrklemm. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@chrklemm if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.19 s (687.4 files/s, 128219.7 lines/s)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                      files          blank        comment           code
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           80           2454           7033          10053
reStructuredText                 23            919            553           2245
Markdown                         13            203              0            770
TeX                               1             20              0            152
JSON                              3              3              0            107
YAML                              5             20             28            104
Bourne Again Shell                2              8              0             37
DOS Batch                         2             12              0             37
Bourne Shell                      2             12              0             31
CSS                               1              1              0              6
TOML                              1              0              0              2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            133           3652           7614          13544
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 885

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120574 is OK
- 10.1186/s13705-021-00323-3 is OK
- 10.1155/2018/6937505 is OK
- 10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.003 is OK
- 10.1109/PSCC.2016.7541031 is OK
- 10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.037 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.041 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.001 is OK
- 10.3390/en12244656 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113705 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot invite @fraukewiese as editor

Hi @fraukewiese, could you edit this submission?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[fraukewiese]

@kyleniemeyer : Thanks for the invitation to edit this paper. I am supervising the PhD of the submitting author Christian Klemm and I have published papers together with him, thus I think somebody else should take the editor role for this submission.

[kyleniemeyer]

@fraukewiese ah, I didn't realize! Yes, we'll need to find someone else.

@timtroendle could you edit this one instead?

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot invite @timtroendle as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[timtroendle]

@kyleniemeyer could do, but I cannot start before the end of the week.

[kyleniemeyer]

@timtroendle not a problem, thank you!

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot assign @timtroendle as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @timtroendle is now the editor

[timtroendle]

@chrklemm looking forward to edit your submission! I will start looking for reviewers. If you have any suggested reviewers, please let us know.

[chrklemm]

Thank you @timtroendle for your time! We think, that the following persons could be suitable reviewers, based on their field of expertise:

euronion
brynpickering
noah80

[chrklemm]

ooo: I will have limited access to Github for the next two weeks, @GregorBecker will answer any upcoming questions during this time.

[timtroendle]

👋 @brynpickering, @euronion & @jordanperr, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[euronion]

@timtroendle I have to decline at the moment, sorry.

[timtroendle]

@euronion thanks for letting us know!

[timtroendle]

👋 @willu47, @nick-gorman & @olejandro, would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[nick-gorman]

@timtroendle yep I'd be happy to :)

[timtroendle]

That's great @nick-gorman , thanks!

[timtroendle]

@editorialbot add @nick-gorman as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@nick-gorman added to the reviewers list!

[willu47]

Hi @timtroendle - yes I can review.

[olejandro]

Hi @timtroendle, sorry, I am reviewing another submission for JOSS at the moment.

[timtroendle]

@willu47 & @olejandro, thanks for letting us know!

[timtroendle]

@editorialbot add @willu47 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@willu47 added to the reviewers list!

[timtroendle]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5519.