[PRE REVIEW]: xclim: xarray-based climate data analytics

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @Zeitsperre (Trevor James Smith)
Repository: https://github.com/Ouranosinc/xclim
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss_submission
Version: v0.42.0
Editor: @kthyng
Reviewers: @kthyng
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9cbcdf32aad971f794cc50f812a46c5f"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9cbcdf32aad971f794cc50f812a46c5f/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9cbcdf32aad971f794cc50f812a46c5f/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9cbcdf32aad971f794cc50f812a46c5f)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @Zeitsperre. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@Zeitsperre if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.55 s (368.0 files/s, 131076.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                         115           8739          13760          30495
YAML                            28             71             40           2826
reStructuredText                20            689            624           1852
TeX                              2            138              0           1851
Jupyter Notebook                19              0           5709           1722
JSON                             3              0              0           1331
SVG                              3              0              0            936
Markdown                         4             68              0            195
TOML                             1             12              3            176
make                             2             30              6             99
INI                              1              6             13             91
CSS                              1             13              3             51
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             27
HTML                             1              0              0              2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           201           9774          20159          41654
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1086

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.5194/gmd-10-4619-2017 is OK
- 10.5334/jors.148 is OK
- 10.1002/essoar.10510291.1 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7382653 is OK
- 10.5065/D6WW7G29 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[kthyng]

Hi @Zeitsperre and thanks for your submission! We are happy to publish this after its review with pyOpenSci. However, we wait until after that point. It looks like it is still under review there? If so, I could add the "paused" label to this until it is finished, then pick it back up to go through the final steps. Sound good?

[Zeitsperre]

Hi @kthyng, thanks for following up!

The package has been accepted by pyOpenSci (pyOpenSci/software-submission#73 (comment), also see: https://www.pyopensci.org/python-packages.html) but we haven't yet created a release (will be v0.43.0) with their "Peer-Reviewed Accepted" tag yet (our next scheduled release is in around two weeks). From my understanding, that is the last thing left for us to do. If you'd like, I can bump this issue once all that is done.

The paper submission is ready for review in a branch and can be found in this PR: Ouranosinc/xclim#250.

[kthyng]

@Zeitsperre Ah sorry I just scrolled to the bottom of the pyOpenSci review issue and it looked on-going. Yes we can proceed on this end then. I need to work on other things for today but I'll be back tomorrow or Friday.

[kthyng]

@Zeitsperre Sorry for my delay — I had a stomach bug come through my household :(

I'll start the processing of your submission!

[kthyng]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @kthyng is now the editor

[kthyng]

@editorialbot add @kthyng as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@kthyng added to the reviewers list!

[kthyng]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5415.