[PRE REVIEW]: ReSurfEMG: A Python library for preprocessing and analysis of respiratory EMG.

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @drcandacemakedamoore (Candace Makeda Moore)
Repository: https://github.com/ReSurfEMG/ReSurfEMG
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.0.8
Editor: @AJQuinn
Reviewers: @marcoghislieri, @ixjlyons
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5f08d1f2bb717b7d05762296e37ded3d"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5f08d1f2bb717b7d05762296e37ded3d/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5f08d1f2bb717b7d05762296e37ded3d/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5f08d1f2bb717b7d05762296e37ded3d)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @drcandacemakedamoore . Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@drcandacemakedamoore if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.42 s (189.5 files/s, 493060.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jupyter Notebook                36              0         193416           7987
Python                          12            673           1121           2557
CSS                              1            192             32            685
Markdown                         7            226              0            521
YAML                             6             36             23            232
TeX                              1              9              0            136
reStructuredText                12             84             64            128
Dockerfile                       1              2              0              4
JSON                             1              1              0              4
Bourne Shell                     1              0              0              3
DOS Batch                        1              0              0              2
SVG                              1              0              0              1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            80           1223         194656          12260
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 871

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/10.661154 is OK
- 10.1007/s00421-010-1521-8 is OK
- 10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04156 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1007/978-3-642-34546-3_71 may be a valid DOI for title: Towards Improving the Usability of Electromyographic Interfaces

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-884X(96)95190-5 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(86)90163-X is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00242.x is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[drcandacemakedamoore]

In terms of editors tuliofalmeida has good expertise from the list, but we will be happy with whatever editors are assigned.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot invite @AJQuinn as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@AJQuinn is this submission something you can help with?

[AJQuinn]

Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman - yep, happy to take this one.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot assign @AJQuinn as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @AJQuinn is now the editor

[AJQuinn]

👋 Hi @drcandacemakedamoore - I'm your topic editor for this submission. First job here is to find and assign some reviewers in this thread before starting the actual review in a new issue.

Please could you let me know if you have any suggestions for reviewers (without tagging them with an @) - you can use the list linked in the first comment or suggest others who may be able to help.

[AJQuinn]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1109/10.661154 is OK
- 10.1007/s00421-010-1521-8 is OK
- 10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04156 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1007/978-3-642-34546-3_71 may be a valid DOI for title: Towards Improving the Usability of Electromyographic Interfaces

INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-884X(96)95190-5 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(86)90163-X is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00242.x is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[AJQuinn]

I was about to ask about the DOIs but looks like you're already on it @drcandacemakedamoore! - resurfemg-org/ReSurfEMG#223

Let me know once you have a fix.

[drcandacemakedamoore]

@AJQuinn We think we have fixed the invalid DOIs, under the missing DOIs it states that "10.1007/978-3-642-34546-3_71 may be a valid DOI for title: Towards Improving the Usability of Electromyographic Interface", and it is, so I'm unsure what the problem is. Anyways, as mentioned above, in terms of editors we think tuliofalmeida probably has good expertise from the list we see, but we will be happy with whatever editors are assigned.

[AJQuinn]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/S0921-884X(96)95190-5 is OK
- 10.1109/10.661154 is OK
- 10.1016/0013-4694(86)90163-X is OK
- 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00242.x is OK
- 10.1007/s00421-010-1521-8 is OK
- 10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y is OK
- 10.21105/joss.04156 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1007/978-3-642-34546-3_71 may be a valid DOI for title: Towards Improving the Usability of Electromyographic Interfaces

INVALID DOIs

- None

[AJQuinn]

@drcandacemakedamoore thanks for the fix. I'll let you know if the remaining DOI query needs further checking.

[AJQuinn]

👋 @marcoghislieri, @JanCBrammer & @ixjlyons would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[JanCBrammer]

@AJQuinn, thanks for the consideration, but I currently don't have the bandwidth for a review.

[marcoghislieri]

Dear @AJQuinn,
Thanks for considering me as a potential reviewer for this submission. I'll be happy to revise this library.
All the best

[ixjlyons]

I'd be happy to review.

[AJQuinn]

No problem @JanCBrammer , thanks for letting me know. And thanks to @ixjlyons @marcoghislieri !

[AJQuinn]

@editorialbot add @marcoghislieri as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@marcoghislieri added to the reviewers list!

[AJQuinn]

@editorialbot add @ixjlyons as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@ixjlyons added to the reviewers list!

[AJQuinn]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5251.