[PRE REVIEW]: GPJax: A didactic Gaussian process package in Jax

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @thomaspinder (Thomas Pinder)
Repository: https://github.com/thomaspinder/GPJax
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.4.5
Editor: @dfm
Reviewers: @gpleiss, @theorashid
Managing EiC: Arfon Smith

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5f3c1d4f6470b0ef3c843d7b8fe3cf27"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5f3c1d4f6470b0ef3c843d7b8fe3cf27/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5f3c1d4f6470b0ef3c843d7b8fe3cf27/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/5f3c1d4f6470b0ef3c843d7b8fe3cf27)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @thomaspinder. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @dfm.

@thomaspinder if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.06 s (966.2 files/s, 103765.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          38           1016           1365           2905
Markdown                         7            133              0            266
TeX                              3             32              0            214
reStructuredText                 4            161            186            104
YAML                             4              6              4             61
make                             2             11             14             34
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
INI                              1              0              0              2
XML                              1              0              0              2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            61           1367           1570           3614
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 667

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[dfm]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

I'm happy to edit this one. EiC: let me know if you'd rather assign it to someone else.

@thomaspinder: I'm offline for the next few days, but I'll do a first editorial pass then start recruiting reviewers next week.

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @dfm is now the editor

[dfm]

@editorialbot add @gpleiss as reviewer

🎉 Thanks @gpleiss for agreeing to review this submission!! I'm hoping to have a second reviewer lined up shortly and then we'll get the main review started in a separate thread.

[editorialbot]

@gpleiss added to the reviewers list!

[dfm]

@editorialbot add @theorashid as reviewer

🎉 Thanks also to @theorashid for coming on board! I'll get the main review started in a separate thread and there will be a lot more information over there.

Thanks all for agreeing to be involved in this process. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me here on GitHub or via email if you have any questions/comments/issues as we go - I'm here to help!

[editorialbot]

@theorashid added to the reviewers list!

[dfm]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #4455.