[PRE REVIEW]: GHEtool: An open-source tool for borefield sizing in Python

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @wouterpeer (Wouter Peere)
Repository: https://github.com/wouterpeere/GHEtool
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main
Version: v2.0.0
Editor: @crvernon
Reviewers: @jasondegraw, @nmstreethran
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0ae2224874ee0139d6f28baa48fe9127"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0ae2224874ee0139d6f28baa48fe9127/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0ae2224874ee0139d6f28baa48fe9127/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/0ae2224874ee0139d6f28baa48fe9127)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @wouterpeer. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@wouterpeer if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: JOSS subfolder

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: JOSS subfolder

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[wouterpeere]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[wouterpeere]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @wouterpeere, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Perform checks on the repository
@editorialbot check repository

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[wouterpeere]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[wouterpeere]

@editorialbot set main as branch

[editorialbot]

Done! branch is now main

[wouterpeere]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[wouterpeere]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[wouterpeere]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot check repository

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.47 s (53.2 files/s, 50780.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          18            517           1552          21478
Markdown                         4             63              0            162
TeX                              1              8              0             57
YAML                             1              1              4             18
TOML                             1              0              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            25            589           1556          21721
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1101

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot invite @crvernon as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[crvernon]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @crvernon is now the editor

[crvernon]

👋 @wouterpeere - I'll be your topic editor for this submission.

The first step in this pre-review will be to find at least 2 reviewers and get the review started. If you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Thanks!

[wouterpeere]

Hi @crvernon ! I think this repository is somewhat related to the interests of jasondegraw and willu47.

[crvernon]

👋 - @jasondegraw Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[crvernon]

👋 - @willu47 Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[wouterpeere]

@crvernon Any more updates?

[jasondegraw]

@crvernon Yes, I can review this submission.

[crvernon]

@editorialbot assign @jasondegraw as reviewer

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[crvernon]

@editorialbot add @jasondegraw as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@jasondegraw added to the reviewers list!

[crvernon]

@wouterpeere I'll find you one more reviewer and then we will move this to full review status.

[crvernon]

👋 - @meghanrjones Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[maxrjones]

Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS?

Thanks for reaching out. Unfortunately I will not be able to review this submission to JOSS.

[wouterpeere]

@crvernon raoulcollenteur is perhaps also a potential reviewer.

[crvernon]

👋 - @raoulcollenteur Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[wouterpeere]

@crvernon also nmstreethran, mefuller and fwitte can be potential reviewers.

[crvernon]

👋 - @nmstreethran , @mefuller , or @fwitte Would either of you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[nmstreethran]

@crvernon Yes, I'd be happy to review this submission.

[crvernon]

Thanks @nmstreethran !

[crvernon]

@editorialbot add @nmstreethran as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@nmstreethran added to the reviewers list!

[crvernon]

👋 - Alright @wouterpeere , @jasondegraw , and @nmstreethran I am going to close this Pre-Review and kick off the full review which you should receive a notification for. Thanks!

[crvernon]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #4406.