[PRE REVIEW]: WaveletsExt.jl: Extending the boundaries of wavelets in Julia

[whedon]

Submitting author: @ShozenD (Shozen Dan)
Repository: https://github.com/UCD4IDS/WaveletsExt.jl
Version: v0.1.10
Editor: @bmcfee
Reviewers: @lostanlen, @malmaud
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/af5f6558736b9c3ec2bd3cf36b0cdf40"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/af5f6558736b9c3ec2bd3cf36b0cdf40/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/af5f6558736b9c3ec2bd3cf36b0cdf40/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/af5f6558736b9c3ec2bd3cf36b0cdf40)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ShozenD. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @bmcfee.

@ShozenD if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1310

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.06 s (925.9 files/s, 197189.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia                           30           1571           1338           7516
Markdown                        18            177              0            893
TeX                              1             17              0            244
YAML                             4              0              1            117
TOML                             3              4              0             49
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            56           1769           1339           8819
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '8eb3153f692ac3a79f4a79b4' was
gathered on 2021/11/12.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/BF01250288 is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4612-2544-7_17 is OK
- 10.1109/78.258102 is OK
- 10.1109/ICASSP.1995.480422 is OK
- 10.1093/biomet/81.3.425 is OK
- 10.2307/2291512 is OK
- 10.1109/TSIPN.2016.2632039 is OK
- 10.1137/1.9781611970104 is OK
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-374370-1.50001-9 is OK
- 10.1201/9781439863619 is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4612-2544-7_5 is OK
- 10.1016/S0031-3203(00)00116-3 is OK
- 10.1016/S0031-3203(02)00019-5 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @bmcfee and @faroit, would one of you be able to edit this one?

[bmcfee]

Sure, I can do this one.

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon assign @bmcfee as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @bmcfee

[bmcfee]

@whedon add @lostanlen as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @lostanlen is now a reviewer

[bmcfee]

@whedon add @malmaud as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @malmaud is now a reviewer

[bmcfee]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #3937.