[PRE REVIEW]: spectrapepper: A Python toolbox for advanced analysis of spectroscopic data for materials and devices

[whedon]

Submitting author: @enricgrau (Enric Grau-Luque)
Repository: https://github.com/spectrapepper/spectrapepper
Version: 0.1.0
Editor: @rkurchin
Reviewers: @stuartcampbell, @ksunden
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d65c85c8917de62f951050c3deaa85f0"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d65c85c8917de62f951050c3deaa85f0/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d65c85c8917de62f951050c3deaa85f0/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/d65c85c8917de62f951050c3deaa85f0)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @enricgrau. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@enricgrau if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Wordcount for paper.md is 884

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.12.036 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-017-01381-4 is OK
- 10.1039/c9ta03625c is OK
- 10.1063/1.5061809 is OK
- 10.1002/PIP.541 is OK
- 10.1039/d1ta01299a is OK
- 10.1002/aenm.201903242 is OK
- 10.1016/j.respol.2005.12.006 is OK
- 10.1002/9781119148739.ch4 is OK
- 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.009 is OK
- 10.1039/d0ee02838j is OK
- 10.1039/c9ta02356a is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 is OK
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 is OK
- 10.5281/ZENODO.4681666 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.5281/ZENODO.4743323 is OK
- 10.1177/0003702819839098 is OK
- 10.1016/j.chemolab.2018.06.009 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- 10.5555/1593511 is INVALID

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.25 s (252.1 files/s, 169755.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript                      17           4513           4497          17139
HTML                            11           1976             33           5174
SVG                              1              0              0           2671
Python                          10            762            880           1786
XML                              1              0              2           1618
CSS                              4            191             35            757
TeX                              1             40              0            335
Markdown                         4             41              0            163
YAML                             7             18              9            163
reStructuredText                 7             89             55            147
JSON                             1              0              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            64           7630           5511          29959
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '8a962bb4dd5f976923fc097f' was
gathered on 2021/09/23.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Enric Tomas Grau Luq            60        111899          82323          100.00
unknown                          1             3              2            0.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Enric Tomas Grau Luq      29577           26.4          2.8               16.06

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kthyng]

@rkurchin is this a good fit for you?

[kthyng]

@whedon invite @rkurchin as editor

[whedon]

@rkurchin has been invited to edit this submission.

[rkurchin]

@whedon assign me as editor

Sure, happy to!

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @rkurchin

[rkurchin]

@ksunden, @stuartcampbell,
Would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[stuartcampbell]

Yes I am willing.

[rkurchin]

@whedon add @stuartcampbell as reviewer

Thanks Stuart! We'll get the main review issue started once we secure another reviewer.

[whedon]

OK, @stuartcampbell is now a reviewer

[ksunden]

I am also willing

[rkurchin]

@whedon add @ksunden as reviewer

Fantastic! Thanks a lot! Stay tuned for review issue and some checklists...

[whedon]

OK, @ksunden is now a reviewer

[rkurchin]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #3781.