[PRE REVIEW]: Visualizations with statistical details: The 'ggstatsplot' approach

[whedon]

Submitting author: @IndrajeetPatil (Indrajeet Patil)
Repository: https://github.com/IndrajeetPatil/ggstatsplot
Version: 0.7.1
Editor: @csoneson
Reviewers: @njtierney, @kevinrue
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @IndrajeetPatil. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @csoneson.

@IndrajeetPatil if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[IndrajeetPatil]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[kthyng]

@whedon check repository

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=1.21 s (210.0 files/s, 88722.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                            69           4650            881          33854
JavaScript                      28           5168           5438          18920
SVG                             26              0              1           7721
R                               60           1035           2679           6091
Markdown                        23           1124              0           5625
Rmd                             22           2080           4400           5082
XML                              2              0              2            609
CSS                              7            108             58            474
YAML                            12             82             19            446
JSON                             2              1              0            381
TeX                              3             30              0            335
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           254          14278          13478          79538
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository 'e3a349548944b834366cf7e3' was
gathered on 2021/03/31.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Indrajeet Patil                 48         54347          15043           99.42
IndrajeetPatil                   5           305             99            0.58

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Indrajeet Patil           39510           72.7          8.9               18.52

[kthyng]

@csoneson I see you're just finishing up a different submission... are you able to take on this new one?

[kthyng]

@whedon invite @csoneson as editor

[whedon]

@csoneson has been invited to edit this submission.

[csoneson]

@whedon assign @csoneson as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @csoneson

[IndrajeetPatil]

Thanks!

Potential reviewers:

• RMHogervorst
• cimentadaj
• njtierney
• humanfactors

[csoneson]

👋 @RMHogervorst, @njtierney - would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS?

Visualizations with statistical details: The 'ggstatsplot' approach

[csoneson]

@IndrajeetPatil - I noticed that a couple of the references cited in your paper are listed as published by JOSS (Ludecke et al, 2021; Patil et al, 2021), but the DOIs go to a preprint server. Could you please correct these references?

[csoneson]

@whedon check references

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.3758/s13428-015-0664-2 is OK
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01100 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01686 is OK
- 10.31234/osf.io/ntbvy is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02815 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02445 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01541 is OK
- 10.31234/osf.io/vtq8f is OK
- 10.21105/joss.01412 is OK
- 10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.02306 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1016/0003-2697(86)90183-1 may be a valid DOI for title: The Elements of Graphing Data

INVALID DOIs

- None

[IndrajeetPatil]

@csoneson Sorry about that. I have fixed the references.

[csoneson]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[IndrajeetPatil]

Do you know how can I avoid the duplicated affiliation index (two instances of 1) here?

[csoneson]

Good question - perhaps @openjournals/dev can help (don't know if it's because the .md is generated from the .Rmd)?

[xuanxu]

Do you know how can I avoid the duplicated affiliation index (two instances of 1) here?

The format of the affiliations section in the metadata is incorrect, should be something like:

affiliations:
 - name: Center for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
   index: 1

[IndrajeetPatil]

Thanks, @xuanxu!

@whedon generate pdf

[IndrajeetPatil]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[IndrajeetPatil]

@xuanxu I changed my .md file according to your suggestion (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IndrajeetPatil/ggstatsplot/master/paper/paper.md), but the second 1 has now moved to the end of the affiliation

[xuanxu]

@IndrajeetPatil You have a dash before the index, so you are creating two affiliation entries.

Current:

affiliations:
  - name: Center for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
  - index: 1

Correct:

affiliations:
  - name: Center for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
    index: 1

[IndrajeetPatil]

Oops 🙈

Thanks, will fix it.

[IndrajeetPatil]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[njtierney]

Hi there!

I'd be happy to review this package. When is the due date?

[csoneson]

Thanks @njtierney! We don't impose a fixed due date (and we're a bit more flexible right now given the challenges brought by the pandemic), but we encourage reviewers to post comments as they go through the submission (no need to collect them all in one big review), and to have an initial assessment for the authors to work on within two weeks from the start of the review.

[csoneson]

@njtierney - I will add you as a reviewer now (and you can of course start looking at the submission), but the actual review will start once we have recruited one more reviewer. At that point I'll open the review issue, where you will find your review checklist etc.

[csoneson]

@whedon assign @njtierney as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @njtierney is now a reviewer

[csoneson]

@whedon add @kevinrue as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @kevinrue is now a reviewer

[csoneson]

@njtierney, @kevinrue - thanks for accepting to review this submission! I'll start the review issue now, and we'll move the discussion over there.

[csoneson]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #3167.