[PRE REVIEW]: OpenOA: An Open-Source Codebase For Operational Analysis of Wind Farms

[whedon]

Submitting author: @jordanperr (Jordan Perr-Sauer)
Repository: https://github.com/NREL/OpenOA
Version: v1
Editor: @sjpfenninger
Reviewers: @gschivley
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @jordanperr. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@jordanperr if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.67 s (95.8 files/s, 17194.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          41           1439           1917           3055
Markdown                         4             96              0            330
Jupyter Notebook                 6              0           3724            195
reStructuredText                 7             99             83            189
JSON                             2             28              0            153
TeX                              1             12              0             91
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             27
YAML                             1              5              0             16
make                             1              4              6             10
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            64           1691           5731           4066
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '2114' was gathered on 2020/02/22.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Caleb                            1             2              1            0.03
Jordan Perr-Sauer               37           867            689           14.69
Lee, Joseph                      4           249            133            3.61
Mike Optis                      32          1953           1011           27.98
Nathan Agarwal                   5            60             58            1.11
Optis                           14           312            143            4.30
Perr-Sauer, Jordan               1          4105              0           38.75
Sebastian Pfaffel                1            46              0            0.43
moptis                           1           249              2            2.37
nateagarwal                      2           627             38            6.28
sebastianpfaffel                 5            33             15            0.45

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Jordan Perr-Sauer           676           78.0          8.2                6.21
Lee, Joseph                 225           90.4          9.8               25.33
Mike Optis                  973           49.8          4.6               15.83
Nathan Agarwal               27           45.0          2.8                0.00
Optis                       183           58.7          9.3               15.85
Perr-Sauer, Jordan         3669           89.4          0.0               13.95
nateagarwal                 626           99.8          0.2               13.26
sebastianpfaffel             32           97.0          2.9                6.25

[whedon]

Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- 10.1088/1742-6596/1037/5/052021 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1037/6/062009 may be missing for title: Understanding Biases in Pre-Construction Estimates

INVALID DOIs

- None

[kyleniemeyer]

@whedon invite @sjpfenninger as editor

[whedon]

@sjpfenninger has been invited to edit this submission.

[kyleniemeyer]

Hey @sjpfenninger, this looks right up your alley!

[whedon]

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

[jordanperr]

Hi @kyleniemeyer and @sjpfenninger,

It looks like most of the Whedon checks were passed. Would it be preferable to swap out the URL for the DOI in reference "Understanding Biases in Pre-Construction Estimate"? It would be no trouble for me to do. I'll monitor this thread for any further questions or changes.

Thank you, and I look forward to your review.

[sjpfenninger]

@kyleniemeyer yes, happy to edit this

[sjpfenninger]

@whedon assign @sjpfenninger as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @sjpfenninger

[sjpfenninger]

@jordanperr Yes the DOI would be preferred, thanks!

[jordanperr]

@sjpfenninger Where is the best place to push this update? Is there a pull request branch somewhere we can iterate in? I don't want to iterate on these changes in our master branch. Thanks.

[kyleniemeyer]

@jordanperr we can generate the PDF from a branch using this command:

@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

[jordanperr]

@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-review

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss-review. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

[jordanperr]

@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-review

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss-review. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

[jordanperr]

@kyleniemeyer DOI has been added

[sjpfenninger]

@jordanperr thanks - meanwhile I've been working offline by email to contact potential reviewers, so hopefully we can start the review soon!

[jordanperr]

@sjpfenninger Sounds good. Let me know if there's anything I can do.

[arfon]

Dear authors and reviewers

We wanted to notify you that in light of the current COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS has decided to suspend submission of new manuscripts and to handle existing manuscripts (such as this one) on a "best efforts basis". We understand that you may need to attend to more pressing issues than completing a review or updating a repository in response to a review. If this is the case, a quick note indicating that you need to put a "pause" on your involvement with a review would be appreciated but is not required.

Thanks in advance for your understanding.

Arfon Smith, Editor in Chief, on behalf of the JOSS editorial team.

[jordanperr]

@sjpfenninger, I hope all is well with you during these trying times. I'd like to know what kind of progress we should expect on this article over the next couple of weeks. I will be here to answer any questions or provide revisions. Thank you, and stay safe.

[sjpfenninger]

@jordanperr Thanks for asking. I am working offline to find reviewers. You are welcome to suggest reviewers here if you have any suitable ones in mind!

[sjpfenninger]

@whedon assign @coroa as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @coroa is now a reviewer

[sjpfenninger]

@whedon assign @gschivley as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @gschivley is now a reviewer

[sjpfenninger]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #2171.

[sjpfenninger]

@coroa @gschivley thanks for agreeing to review, and we understand that things are likely to take longer given the current circumstances. Let's head over to #2171 for the actual review!