Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8337795: Type annotation attached to incorrect type during class reading #67

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

cushon
Copy link
Contributor

@cushon cushon commented Aug 13, 2024

This change fixes a bug in javac's handling of type annotations in bytecode, which was logic first added in JDK 22 as part of the fix for JDK-8225377.


Progress

  • JDK-8337795 needs maintainer approval
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8337795: Type annotation attached to incorrect type during class reading (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk23u.git pull/67/head:pull/67
$ git checkout pull/67

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/67
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk23u.git pull/67/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 67

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 67

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk23u/pull/67.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 13, 2024

👋 Welcome back cushon! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 13, 2024

@cushon This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8337795: Type annotation attached to incorrect type during class reading

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 59 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • bd44358: 8335789: [TESTBUG] XparColor.java test fails with Error. Parse Exception: Invalid or unrecognized bugid: @
  • f63b702: 8340306: Add border around instructions in PassFailJFrame
  • faa89f4: 8340210: Add positionTestUI() to PassFailJFrame.Builder
  • b8d01b0: 8340308: PassFailJFrame: Make rows default to number of lines in instructions
  • fa008de: 8332901: Select{Current,New}ItemTest.java for Choice don't open popup on macOS
  • e4badd4: 8340007: Refactor KeyEvent/FunctionKeyTest.java
  • 20c1153: 8340008: KeyEvent/KeyTyped/Numpad1KeyTyped.java has 15 seconds timeout
  • caf28d4: 8338924: C1: assert(0 <= i && i < _len) failed: illegal index 5 for length 5
  • 54bb851: 8338389: [JFR] Long strings should be added to the string pool
  • 5979904: 8337876: [IR Framework] Add support for IR tests with @stable
  • ... and 49 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk23u/compare/afba2b3467333cc1910114c2d194912763c5a5f4...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 8d0831478338e9b084b2c47f46eba9faae3a5eb6 8337795: Type annotation attached to incorrect type during class reading Aug 13, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 13, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@cushon cushon marked this pull request as ready for review August 13, 2024 17:22
@cushon
Copy link
Contributor Author

cushon commented Aug 13, 2024

/approval request This change fixes a bug in javac's handling of type annotations in bytecode, which was logic first added in JDK 22 as part of the fix for JDK-8225377. The patch applies cleanly, and langtools tier1 passes.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 13, 2024

@cushon
8337795: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 13, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Webrevs

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 18, 2024

@cushon This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@cushon
Copy link
Contributor Author

cushon commented Sep 18, 2024

Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

The backport has maintainer approval, is there anything else I should be doing to help progress this towards integration?

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

Add a "/integrate" comment and I'll sponsor.

@cushon
Copy link
Contributor Author

cushon commented Sep 27, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Sep 27, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 27, 2024

@cushon
Your change (at version c7b59e5) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Going to push as commit a55e476.
Since your change was applied there have been 59 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • bd44358: 8335789: [TESTBUG] XparColor.java test fails with Error. Parse Exception: Invalid or unrecognized bugid: @
  • f63b702: 8340306: Add border around instructions in PassFailJFrame
  • faa89f4: 8340210: Add positionTestUI() to PassFailJFrame.Builder
  • b8d01b0: 8340308: PassFailJFrame: Make rows default to number of lines in instructions
  • fa008de: 8332901: Select{Current,New}ItemTest.java for Choice don't open popup on macOS
  • e4badd4: 8340007: Refactor KeyEvent/FunctionKeyTest.java
  • 20c1153: 8340008: KeyEvent/KeyTyped/Numpad1KeyTyped.java has 15 seconds timeout
  • caf28d4: 8338924: C1: assert(0 <= i && i < _len) failed: illegal index 5 for length 5
  • 54bb851: 8338389: [JFR] Long strings should be added to the string pool
  • 5979904: 8337876: [IR Framework] Add support for IR tests with @stable
  • ... and 49 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk23u/compare/afba2b3467333cc1910114c2d194912763c5a5f4...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 27, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 27, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 27, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Sep 27, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 27, 2024

@phohensee @cushon Pushed as commit a55e476.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants