You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to propose to use a combination of segment and module/group id instead of the serial number to identify LCN things (when using automatic discovery).
It could be represented e.g. in the format
S<segment_id>M<module_id>
resp. S<segment_id>G<group_id>
LCN modules (smart/bus modules) are uniquely identified by this combination. Furthermore - as far as I know - using the module id (in combination with the segment id, if in bigger environments the installation is splitted into segments) is the common approach to identify modules when planning/programming LCN bus systems. (Logical) LCN groups are handled analogously.
In my opinion this would make textual item and rule definitions much more readable and maintainable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
toweosp
changed the title
[LCN] Reference modules and groups by segment id and module/group id instead of serial number
[lcn] Reference modules and groups by segment id and module/group id instead of serial number
Jul 10, 2020
I would like to propose to use a combination of segment and module/group id instead of the serial number to identify LCN things (when using automatic discovery).
It could be represented e.g. in the format
S<segment_id>M<module_id>
resp.
S<segment_id>G<group_id>
LCN modules (smart/bus modules) are uniquely identified by this combination. Furthermore - as far as I know - using the module id (in combination with the segment id, if in bigger environments the installation is splitted into segments) is the common approach to identify modules when planning/programming LCN bus systems. (Logical) LCN groups are handled analogously.
In my opinion this would make textual item and rule definitions much more readable and maintainable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: