-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Formalise vocabulary for defining position of borehole elements #22
Comments
According to ISO 6709 and ISO 19111: https://www.sis.se/api/document/preview/910055/ Altitude : "height where the chosen reference surface is mean sea level" Height : "distance of a point from a chosen reference surface measured upward along a line perpendicular to that surface" Depth : "distance of a point from a chosen reference surface measured downward along a line perpendicular to that surface." |
Right, We need to include this in the conceptual model as different elements in a borehole can be positionned using any of those concepts |
Maybe this issue should be merged with Issue #21 |
You mean #21 ? |
yes, fixed it, thanks |
Agreeing first on those vocabs is not a bad idea. It would ensure that we understand the same things in #21. |
Regarding the ISO 19111 definition : "Depth" is the opposite of "Height" and mention a reference surface. If we agree on ISO 19111 definition, then "Depth" shall not be used to define a position along our borehole trajectory. |
Also, depth is linear (along gravity ?). We need another word to define distance along borehole. |
Yes in perfectly vertical boreholes this is the same > we shall limit to that use case :-) +1 to have a dedicated github issue for distance along borehole |
This is most of all what we end up doing in the IE (with BhML) |
Good presentation here
https://dl.ppdm.org/dl/109
Need to formalise 'elevation', 'height' and 'depth'
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: