-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 729
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Vouchers] The note regarding order total less than voucher amount shouldn't be displayed for percentage vouchers #11666
Comments
Confirmed papercut :) |
Hey @drummer83 - I'd like to work on this issue. Can I please get assigned to it? Thanks :) |
Of course, and welcome, @prateek0411999! |
Hi @drummer83, I've raised a pull request for the same (#11694) Let me know if any change is required in this |
Thank you, @prateek0411999! |
Hey @drummer83 , as far as I can see the problem you are describing shouldn't be happening right now. I have not been able to reproduce it, could you check again ? and if you manage to reproduce it, could you provide more detailed step to reproduce ? I have a feeling this might have been an issue at some point, but it got resolved as part of another bug fix. |
Hey @rioug, As per my observation this issue is still persisted, i was able to reproduce the same as well that's why i've raised the PR. |
Agree, this one is not clear how to reproduce... Below a percentage voucher is added, but no warning is displayed. This is before staging the associated PR: Also the pic in the description displays a flat amount voucher. Any ideas? Edit: got it now - order amount needs to be lower that the voucher percentage value. |
Thanks @prateek0411999 - your spec documented it nicely 🙏 |
Description
The note 'Note: if your order total is less than your voucher you may not be able to spend the remaining value.' displayed at step 2 of checkout shouldn't be displayed for percentage vouchers because in this case it can't happen.
Steps to Reproduce
Let's add an automated test for this
Severity
bug-s4: it's annoying, but you can use it
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: