-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactoring Proposal: Rename Content
model to RawContent
#32
Comments
I like it 👍🏻 |
ormsbee
changed the title
Proposal: Rename
Refactoring Proposal: Rename Feb 16, 2023
Content
model to RawContent
Content
model to RawContent
Seems reasonable to me. 👍🏻 |
Makes sense to me as well. 👍🏾 |
Accepted and closing, as I'm doing this work as part of #33 |
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from To do
to In Progress
in Modular Learning - Tagging and Libraries
Apr 1, 2023
ormsbee
moved this from In Progress
to Done
in Modular Learning - Tagging and Libraries
Apr 19, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I've come to appreciate that I use the word "Content" all the time in a very general sense, and I don't want to cause confusion about whether I'm talking about a general concept or a specific low level model.
RawContent
has a more accurate connotation of what it is (pretty much bytes with only the barest MIME type metadata). And it makes join tables not too awkward–ComponentVersionRawContent
is understandable, for instance.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: