Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

descriptor: discuss the reserved fields #125

Closed
philips opened this issue Jun 7, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

descriptor: discuss the reserved fields #125

philips opened this issue Jun 7, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
component/descriptor spec kind/question priority/P2
Milestone
post-v1.0.0

Comments

@philips
Copy link
Contributor

philips commented Jun 7, 2016

The descriptor spec has a section on reserved fields which we really don't have great precedent for. This issue is to discuss the formalization or removal of the "reserved" concept across the spec.

Previous discussions:
#111 (diff)
#111 (diff)
@philips philips added this to the post-v1.0.0 milestone Jun 7, 2016
@wking
Copy link
Contributor

wking commented Jun 7, 2016

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:33:21PM -0700, Brandon Philips wrote:

Previous discussions:
#111 (diff)
#111 (diff)

And also in 1, where I argue for for JSON-LD to get explicit,
per-property semantics.

@wking wking mentioned this issue Sep 29, 2016
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
component/descriptor spec kind/question priority/P2
Projects
None yet
Milestone
post-v1.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@philips @wking