-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 234
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use PresentLink for verbatim patterns #1882
Comments
Knee-jerk reaction is that it's a good idea. Be forewarned that the code the code that implements So, sure, what you propose sounds like a pretty good idea, at the moment. Not sure just how easy or hard it would be to hack it. Making all the booleans work correctly with present/absent won't be easy. |
Here is my half-finished attempt to cleanup/modernize absentlink https://github.com/linas/atomspace/tree/absent-link-rework |
See also #1596 |
Cool! I'll have a look at your old branch see if I can take a stab at it. |
I think this is fixed in pull req #2172 -- a minimal proof that it works is in |
Excellent, will test it in more depth as I port my code to use PresentLink over the next few weeks. |
OK, please close this issue as soon as you see fit; if you find problems, please open a new issue. |
@leungmanhin @amebel @Necr0x0Der @vsbogd and others, I give you the green-light to use |
Awesome! I'll try it out |
@ngeiswei -- next step: use |
I wonder if we could use
PresentLink
to avoid most quotations.For instance, currently
raises an exception because it attempts to run the grounded predicate.
Wouldn't it be cool if it were instead equivalent to
?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: