You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue is to complement the Section "Represent Problem Data in AtomSpace" of issue #3 as well as much of what has been discussed in issue #12 (from comment #12 (comment) and on). I prefer to create a separate issue for it rather than continuing growing #12 .
Here's yet another way to represent the data (not saying we should implement it, it's just worth considering)
where CurriedFunMapLink is the same thing as in #11 but instead of taking 2 arguments, a function and a list, it takes a single function and turns it into a function from list of inputs to list of outputs.
CurriedFunMapLink could obviously be decomposed into smaller parts, like a say using a CurryLink and a FunMapLink. But since we have none at this point there is no point bothering. And obviously PutLink could probably be used instead of FunMapLink, as @kasimebrahim would probably have pointed out.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ngeiswei
changed the title
Data (typically csv file content, etc) representations in Atomese
Data (like csv file content) representations in Atomese
Jun 28, 2018
This issue is to complement the Section "Represent Problem Data in AtomSpace" of issue #3 as well as much of what has been discussed in issue #12 (from comment #12 (comment) and on). I prefer to create a separate issue for it rather than continuing growing #12 .
Here's yet another way to represent the data (not saying we should implement it, it's just worth considering)
where
CurriedFunMapLink
is the same thing as in #11 but instead of taking 2 arguments, a function and a list, it takes a single function and turns it into a function from list of inputs to list of outputs.CurriedFunMapLink
could obviously be decomposed into smaller parts, like a say using aCurryLink
and aFunMapLink
. But since we have none at this point there is no point bothering. And obviouslyPutLink
could probably be used instead ofFunMapLink
, as @kasimebrahim would probably have pointed out.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: