New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Negative citation timespan #4

Open

essepuntato opened this issue Jan 6, 2019 · 0 comments

Labels

bug

Member

essepuntato commented Jan 6, 2019

Even if it is possible that negative citation timespan exist, it would be good to check them, since some can be actually mistakes in the source data.

For instance see the citations of 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1996.00099.x. Here there are at least two examples, i.e. oci:020010008003600000201080803093701090907370101010000090209-0200101010136193701060001630502020337010909063700000009093733 and oci:0200100080036000809020700010437020000003709050202080003-0200101010136193701060001630502020337010909063700000009093733, that have a negative citation timespan, and this seems to be due to the data originally contained in Crossref that are not correct.

essepuntato added the bug label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment