You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I spawn the code on windows platform and using MPICH2 to develop.
My hardware platform is on two workstation with multicore(intel Xeon 2CPU
with E5435).So I have 16 cores to use.The communication between two
workstaion is using high speed lan. But I got low speedup on it. Could you
tell me the reason? Thanks.
The speedup figures can be found in following figs. The communication time
sometimes are longer than the computation time.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 5 May 2008 at 11:24
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi William,
For you problem, the problem size is too small.
If the dataset could be larger, most time will be spent on the step E = I + H^T
* D *
H and this step could archive good speedup. For small dataset, time is mostly
spent
on other steps (such as CF: cholesky factorization) and in this case, the
speedup is low.
Hi,
After do some large dataset, i found the psvm is a large memory-consuming code
during the ICF
period.The RCV1 and ijcnn1 dataset are tested on my cluster. The result is not
so well.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
[email protected]
on 5 May 2008 at 11:24The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: