Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SDK autoconfigure #890

Open
slinkydeveloper opened this issue Oct 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

SDK autoconfigure #890

slinkydeveloper opened this issue Oct 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
A-common Area:common issues that not related to specific pillar enhancement New feature or request M-sdk release:allowed-for-stable Changes that can still be added before Stable, but won't require Breaking Interfaces.

Comments

@slinkydeveloper
Copy link

Hi all, I'm using sdk autoconfigure on Java and I was wondering, is there something similar for the rust sdk? Is not, is there any plan/idea to implement it?

@lf-
Copy link

lf- commented Oct 11, 2022

Some of these variables work as-is. It's a work in progress. See #774

@jtescher
Copy link
Member

Yeah the env config for each crate should be supported, there are some features like being able to select an exporter via variables that would require having all the exporters as dependencies. If someone wanted to maintain a new crate that provided that functionality it would also be possible.

@hdost hdost added enhancement New feature or request A-common Area:common issues that not related to specific pillar release:allowed-for-stable Changes that can still be added before Stable, but won't require Breaking Interfaces. M-sdk labels Feb 21, 2024
@hdost hdost added this to the Tracing SDK Stable milestone Feb 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-common Area:common issues that not related to specific pillar enhancement New feature or request M-sdk release:allowed-for-stable Changes that can still be added before Stable, but won't require Breaking Interfaces.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants