You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are currently preparing for the upcoming 1.0 GA release. Feature requests that are not aligned with
the current roadmap and are not aimed at stabilizing and preparing the Collector for the release will
not be prioritized.
Delete this paragraph before submitting.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Tail sampling processor buffers spans in memory to make sampling decision of traces. When we update the config, sampling percentage for example, we update the yaml file and send a SIGHUP to the collector process. However, Otel collector restarts when it receives the SIGHUP. The buffered data are lost in the restart.
Describe the solution you'd like
Either the tail sampling process provides a way to dynamically update configuration at runtime, or Otel collector can do it in general. The later one is better since other processors, e.g. batch processor, may face the same issue.
It can be a feature of OpAMP as well as @cforce mentioned in #4205.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Important (read before submitting)
We are currently preparing for the upcoming 1.0 GA release. Feature requests that are not aligned with
the current roadmap and are not aimed at stabilizing and preparing the Collector for the release will
not be prioritized.
Delete this paragraph before submitting.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Tail sampling processor buffers spans in memory to make sampling decision of traces. When we update the config, sampling percentage for example, we update the yaml file and send a SIGHUP to the collector process. However, Otel collector restarts when it receives the SIGHUP. The buffered data are lost in the restart.
Describe the solution you'd like
Either the tail sampling process provides a way to dynamically update configuration at runtime, or Otel collector can do it in general. The later one is better since other processors, e.g. batch processor, may face the same issue.
It can be a feature of OpAMP as well as @cforce mentioned in #4205.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: