Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[receiver/awscontainerinsight] High cardinality with default configuration #35861

Open
pjanotti opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
Labels

Comments

@pjanotti
Copy link
Contributor

pjanotti commented Oct 17, 2024

Component(s)

receiver/awscontainerinsight

What happened?

Description

Enabling the receiver generates high cardinality metrics since, by default, it adds Timestamp to the published metrics resource.

Steps to Reproduce

Enable the receiver in an AWS ECS EC2 cluster.

Expected Result

No high cardinality metrics from enabling the receiver.

Actual Result

High cardinality metrics.

Collector version

v0.111.0

Environment information

Environment

OS: (e.g., "Ubuntu 20.04")
Compiler(if manually compiled): (e.g., "go 14.2")

OpenTelemetry Collector configuration

No response

Log output

No response

Additional context

The Timestamp may be useful for some post processing by some AWS service, however, per general recommendation on OTel high-cardinality metrics should be avoided on the default configuration, even if a workaround using the resource attribute processor is relatively easy. It seems to me that this attribute should be disabled by default and possibly enabled by some specific configuration.

@pjanotti pjanotti added bug Something isn't working needs triage New item requiring triage labels Oct 17, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging code owners:

See Adding Labels via Comments if you do not have permissions to add labels yourself.

@pjanotti pjanotti changed the title [awscontainerinsightsreceiver] High cardinality with default configuration [receiver/awscontainerinsight] High cardinality with default configuration Oct 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant