[Question] Conflicting behavior of disperse siblings and apply easy days

[shivangp76]

Research

Enter an [x] character to confirm the points below:

• I have checked the FAQ and could not find an answer to my question
• I have read the wiki and still felt confused
• I have searched for similar existing questions here

Question

1. Doesn't the current implementation of disperse siblings and apply easy days conflict one another? Disperse siblings tries to maximize the minimum gap between siblings, which could result in more load being put on easy days. On the other hand, if I run apply easy days, won't siblings possibly be dispersed away from easy days meaning they might be closer together? Is there any way to reconcile these behaviors?
2. Is the config value for load_balance better thought of as enable_easy_days? In other words, if load_balance is true, then that is equivalent to applying easy days with equal weights for each day (ex. 1 for each day).

[L-M-Sherlock]

1. Yes, they are conflicting to each other. It's challenging to reconcile them via the add-on.
2. It's a naming issue. Enabling easy days but setting all weights to 1.0 doesn't make any day easy.