You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the ffspart command line requires you to specify:
block size (in hex?!)
number of blocks
A friendlier UI would be to specify the:
optionally, total output size in megabytes
optionally, the block size
The description of the ffs gives the total size of the ffs image being crated, so the only reason a user should specify it is when they want a pnor that is larger than the partition data they have.
The block size is not required for creating a ffs layout. It is a good idea to create a layout where the partitions lie on eraseblock boundaries, and therefore are at least one earaseblock in size, but this is not required.
Currently the ffspart command line requires you to specify:
A friendlier UI would be to specify the:
The description of the ffs gives the total size of the ffs image being crated, so the only reason a user should specify it is when they want a pnor that is larger than the partition data they have.
The block size is not required for creating a ffs layout. It is a good idea to create a layout where the partitions lie on eraseblock boundaries, and therefore are at least one earaseblock in size, but this is not required.
This could fix #202 too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: