[Refactor] use mmengine.basemodule instead of nn.module

[Z-Fran]

Thanks for your contribution and we appreciate it a lot. The following instructions would make your pull request more healthy and more easily get feedback. If you do not understand some items, don't worry, just make the pull request and seek help from maintainers.

Motivation

[Refactor] use mmengine.basemodule instead of nn.module

Modification

Use mmengine.basemodule instead of nn.module

• 1. basicvsr and basicvsr++
• 2. aot-gan
• 3. cain
• 4. deepfillv1_
• 5. deepfillv2
• 6. dim
• 7. edsr
• 8. edvr
• 9. gl
• 10. iconvsr
• 11. indexnet
• 12. liif-
• 13. pconv
• 14. rdn
• 15. realbasicvsr
• 16. realesrnet_
• 17. realesrgan
• 18. srcnn
• 19. msrresnet_
• 20. srgan
• 21. tdan

Who can help? @ them here!

BC-breaking (Optional)

Does the modification introduce changes that break the backward-compatibility of the downstream repositories?
If so, please describe how it breaks the compatibility and how the downstream projects should modify their code to keep compatibility with this PR.

Use cases (Optional)

If this PR introduces a new feature, it is better to list some use cases here, and update the documentation.

Checklist

Before PR:

• I have read and followed the workflow indicated in the CONTRIBUTING.md to create this PR.
• Pre-commit or linting tools indicated in CONTRIBUTING.md are used to fix the potential lint issues.
• Bug fixes are covered by unit tests, the case that causes the bug should be added in the unit tests.
• New functionalities are covered by complete unit tests. If not, please add more unit test to ensure the correctness.
• The documentation has been modified accordingly, including docstring or example tutorials.

After PR:

• If the modification has potential influence on downstream or other related projects, this PR should be tested with some of those projects.
• CLA has been signed and all committers have signed the CLA in this PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 87.93% // Head: 88.00% // Increases project coverage by +0.07% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (2377f1f) compared to base (936c346).
Patch coverage: 89.61% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           dev-1.x    #1491      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    87.93%   88.00%   +0.07%     
===========================================
  Files          399      399              
  Lines        26059    26029      -30     
  Branches      4051     4039      -12     
===========================================
- Hits         22914    22906       -8     
+ Misses        2240     2221      -19     
+ Partials       905      902       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	88.00% <89.61%> (+0.07%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...medit/models/editors/aotgan/aot_encoder_decoder.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ls/editors/deepfillv2/two_stage_encoder_decoder.py	75.75% <33.33%> (+7.33%)	⬆️
mmedit/models/base_archs/smpatch_disc.py	93.75% <60.00%> (+9.96%)	⬆️
mmedit/models/editors/aotgan/aot_decoder.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
mmedit/models/editors/aotgan/aot_encoder.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
mmedit/models/editors/aotgan/aot_neck.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
mmedit/models/editors/basicvsr/basicvsr_net.py	95.31% <100.00%> (ø)
mmedit/models/editors/cain/cain_net.py	98.97% <100.00%> (ø)
.../models/editors/deepfillv1/contextual_attention.py	95.28% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
...ls/editors/deepfillv1/contextual_attention_neck.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 16 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.