Use mmengine.basemodole instead of nn.module

[plyfager]

Thanks for your contribution and we appreciate it a lot. The following instructions would make your pull request more healthy and more easily get feedback. If you do not understand some items, don't worry, just make the pull request and seek help from maintainers.

Motivation

Please describe the motivation of this PR and the goal you want to achieve through this PR.

Modification

Please briefly describe what modification is made in this PR.

Who can help? @ them here!

BC-breaking (Optional)

Does the modification introduce changes that break the backward-compatibility of the downstream repositories?
If so, please describe how it breaks the compatibility and how the downstream projects should modify their code to keep compatibility with this PR.

Use cases (Optional)

If this PR introduces a new feature, it is better to list some use cases here, and update the documentation.

Checklist

Before PR:

• I have read and followed the workflow indicated in the CONTRIBUTING.md to create this PR.
• Pre-commit or linting tools indicated in CONTRIBUTING.md are used to fix the potential lint issues.
• Bug fixes are covered by unit tests, the case that causes the bug should be added in the unit tests.
• New functionalities are covered by complete unit tests. If not, please add more unit test to ensure the correctness.
• The documentation has been modified accordingly, including docstring or example tutorials.

After PR:

• If the modification has potential influence on downstream or other related projects, this PR should be tested with some of those projects.
• CLA has been signed and all committers have signed the CLA in this PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (51b2847) 82.30% compared to head (f69f2b5) 82.31%.

❗ Current head f69f2b5 differs from pull request most recent head 31c743e. Consider uploading reports for the commit 31c743e to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1434   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.30%   82.31%           
=======================================
  Files         416      416           
  Lines       27954    27966   +12     
  Branches     4375     4375           
=======================================
+ Hits        23008    23020   +12     
  Misses       3997     3997           
  Partials      949      949           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	82.31% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
mmagic/models/editors/stylegan1/stylegan_utils.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
mmagic/models/editors/lsgan/lsgan_discriminator.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
mmagic/models/editors/lsgan/lsgan_generator.py	94.00% <100.00%> (+0.12%)	⬆️
...els/editors/mspie/mspie_stylegan2_discriminator.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../models/editors/mspie/mspie_stylegan2_generator.py	48.55% <100.00%> (+0.29%)	⬆️
...ic/models/editors/mspie/mspie_stylegan2_modules.py	45.45% <100.00%> (+0.50%)	⬆️
mmagic/models/editors/mspie/positional_encoding.py	81.72% <100.00%> (ø)
mmagic/models/editors/pggan/pggan_discriminator.py	87.95% <100.00%> (+0.14%)	⬆️
mmagic/models/editors/pggan/pggan_generator.py	86.66% <100.00%> (+0.14%)	⬆️
mmagic/models/editors/pggan/pggan_modules.py	91.17% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 11 more

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.