-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: javadoc and tests for api, context #942
Conversation
3a5bc97
to
e43f7c8
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #942 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 95.04% 95.27% +0.22%
- Complexity 392 393 +1
============================================
Files 38 38
Lines 888 888
Branches 54 54
============================================
+ Hits 844 846 +2
+ Misses 24 23 -1
+ Partials 20 19 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
assertEquals("4", merged.getValue("common5").asString(), "invocation merge is incorrect"); | ||
assertEquals("4", merged.getValue("common6").asString(), "invocation merge is incorrect"); | ||
|
||
c.getBooleanValue("key", false, invocationCtx); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
instead of the specific "getMergedContext" method, I simply used a spy here.
@@ -17,18 +15,13 @@ public DoSomethingProvider(ImmutableMetadata flagMetadata) { | |||
this.flagMetadata = flagMetadata; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
EvaluationContext getMergedContext() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This method is no longer needed, spies work better.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice set of improvements
Please see this to avoid conflicts in documentation
@toddbaert I think this can be rebased an considered for 1.8.1 release :) |
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
716b105
to
638db9c
Compare
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
This PR contains no functional changes, it:
fixes: #939