Possible new objects to add within the models

[jonquet]

After the introduction of "agents" in our models (with release 2.7) we can see the value of structuring the metadata values with complex objects rather than just literals (string, integer, boolean) or URIs.

This is a possible list properties in our metadata model (based on MOD2) that we coud consider creating "complex objects" in our models for:

• License?
• Reference ?
• Notes and reviews=> déjà le cas. A améliorer.
• Analytics => déjà le cas. A améliorer.
• Bug-database ?
• Code Reposiotry ?
• Todo-list ?
• Award ?
• knownUsage ?
• designedForTask
• subject => faudrait que ce soit une classe d’une ontologie dans le portail
• example of use
• competencyQuestion
• Sample queries
• Was generated by, Was invalidated by => prov:Activity
• FAIR assessment
• IncludedInDataCatalogue => oui celui-la cela a du sens. En particulier pour la federation.
• Relations (18 propertires) => oui faudrait que ce soit une ontologie
• Changes
• Associated media (+logo et depiction)
• Metrics => déjà le cas. A améliorer.

Possibly those objets (range of those properties) shall be defined in MOD: https://github.com/FAIR-IMPACT/MOD
AgroPortal provide already some of them with the notion of "links" e.g.

[jonquet]

See this diagram to see the "objects" defined within MOD
https://github.com/FAIR-IMPACT/MOD/blob/main/figures/MOD2.0_in_a_nutshell.png

[jonquet]

Step to do this work would be:

• Incorporate the complex object already existing in AgroPortal (metrics, agents, reviews, notes, etc. ) into MOD
• Complete MOD with all the new complex objects we wish to see around an ontology (task, usage, FAIRness assessment, Evaluation CompetencyQuestion ...)
• Complete AgroPortal models to incorportate the news ones
• Refactor (not backward compatible) the AgroPortal model to match exactly the new complete MOD
• In the future, only change AgroPortal model if MOD model evolves.