Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

superficialPart part contradiction #16

Open
fcbr opened this issue Jun 15, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

superficialPart part contradiction #16

fcbr opened this issue Jun 15, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@fcbr
Copy link

fcbr commented Jun 15, 2016

Similar to #7 and others, so I'll skip the details.

(subrelation superficialPart part)
(instance superficialPart PartialValuedRelation)
(instance part PartialOrderingRelation)
(subclass PartialOrderingRelation TotalValuedRelation)
@apease
Copy link
Contributor

apease commented Jun 8, 2019

substitute

(=>
(superficialPart ?PART ?WHOLE)
(part ?PART ?WHOLE))

for subrelation

@apease apease closed this as completed Jun 8, 2019
@apease apease mentioned this issue Jun 18, 2019
Open
@arademaker arademaker reopened this Jun 18, 2019
@arademaker
Copy link
Contributor

We need to add domain statements for this relation and others changed in a similar way.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@arademaker @fcbr @apease