You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Child-chain is facing scalability challenges because /tx.submit returns in-flight transaction position in the future block.
This has a site-effect by allowing Unfinalized Transaction Chaining which we considered good to have (usability over security).
I can recall at the ALD implementation phase we're preparing for more generic output identifier, say {tx_hash, output_index}
Issue Type
[ ] bug report
[x] feature request
Current Behavior
Output identifier is described as a triplet {block_number, tx_index, output_index} which is here often encoded as uint256
This approach benefits us in
deposit discoverability (tell whether output is an deposit)
exit priority
canonicity game
... ❓
Expected Behavior
How hard is to express output id in terms independent of the block / position? Natural candidate is pair {tx_hash, output_index}
Motivation for Change
Main motivation is to free child-chain's transaction acceptance from block formation. Further it allows to identify in-flight transactions and their outputs. It allows for Unfinalized Transaction Chaining.
System Specs
Plasma framework
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
pnowosie
changed the title
Change output identifier from utxo position to {tx_hash, output_index}
Change output identifier to not contain on block number
Oct 21, 2020
pnowosie
changed the title
Change output identifier to not contain on block number
Change output identifier to not contain block number
Oct 21, 2020
pnowosie
changed the title
Change output identifier to not contain block number
Change output identifier to be independent of position in the block
Oct 21, 2020
pnowosie
changed the title
Change output identifier to be independent of position in the block
Change output identifier to be independent of the position in the block
Oct 21, 2020
I recall the previous push back was from elixir side complexity though. We have OutputId in our contract now so that should be the replacement if we'd like to commit to this change.
Child-chain is facing scalability challenges because
/tx.submit
returns in-flight transaction position in the future block.This has a site-effect by allowing Unfinalized Transaction Chaining which we considered good to have (usability over security).
I can recall at the ALD implementation phase we're preparing for more generic output identifier, say
{tx_hash, output_index}
Issue Type
Current Behavior
Output identifier is described as a triplet
{block_number, tx_index, output_index}
which is here often encoded asuint256
This approach benefits us in
Expected Behavior
How hard is to express output id in terms independent of the block / position? Natural candidate is pair
{tx_hash, output_index}
Motivation for Change
Main motivation is to free child-chain's transaction acceptance from block formation. Further it allows to identify in-flight transactions and their outputs. It allows for Unfinalized Transaction Chaining.
System Specs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: