Consider switching website to gh-pages

[rufuspollock]

• Downside
  • more tecchy
• Upside:
  • we could include licenses api, license texts etc
  • more techhy

Note we don't blog much as it is ...

[ddie]

I know is cool, but I don't see the advantage.

[mlinksva]

Other upside is public history comes free.

[mlinksva]

Oh, however while I'd prefer opendefinition.org to be a static site, hosting on github would be a bit ironic for the home of the OSSD. It is already ironic enough that github hosts its development.

[rufuspollock]

@ddie this is not about coolness or not it's about integrating material more - see below.

@mlinksva i'm happy to try gitorious :-)

The real issue here is not the hosting but what lives on the website. I've booted a separate issue: #5 so we can focus on that and come back to the question of technology.

[mlinksva]

Closing. Can revisit tech choices if/when more concrete desire and resources to redo opendefinition.org site. Leaving #5 open in that regard.

[rufuspollock]

See #47 for new version of this issue.