Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[incremental cycles] Abstract vertex set type #3081

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ejgallego
Copy link
Collaborator

After discussion in #2959 , we abstract the vertex set representation in incremental cycles.

cc: @Armael

I used `Result.t` type, not sure this is the right choice.

The implementation is a bit quite hackish for the `Map` case, maybe it
should be upstreamed into OCaml; suggestions welcome.

Signed-off-by: Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias <[email protected]>
@ejgallego ejgallego force-pushed the intf_vertexset branch 2 times, most recently from cf5aca7 to c0fe8cc Compare February 4, 2020 22:43
This way clients can provide their own iterator.

Signed-off-by: Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias <[email protected]>
@ejgallego
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ejgallego commented Feb 6, 2020

I'm going to close this for now; given that the solution in #2959 doesn't finally need a change of API.

If upstream wants to tweak the API more we can just indeed follow up in their repos.

@ejgallego ejgallego closed this Feb 6, 2020
@ejgallego ejgallego deleted the intf_vertexset branch February 6, 2020 20:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant