-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 409
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
@all
should not try to build -custom bytecode executables
#1675
Comments
Better still, maybe a dedicated |
Indeed, we talked about that with @rgrinberg. The only issue is that we can't remove the target when the |
@nojb do you want to work on this? |
We just talk about this with @rgrinberg, putting it in the workspace file might break the build of vendored projects, so it should really only go in the |
I am interested in the feature, but it is not blocking so I don't want to commit myself at the moment due to extremely tight time availability right now. |
When defining
byte
executables purely for the purpose of compiling to JS with-no-check-prims
to avoid errors due to primitives which are only present in JS, they cause errors when compiling in-custom
which makes@all
unusable.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: