Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix deterministic ID handling with unicode #300

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 14, 2019

Conversation

chisholm
Copy link
Contributor

Fix deterministic ID handling when there are high-codepoint unicode characters. Make compatible with both python 2 and 3.

Fixes #292

unicode characters.  Make compatible with both python 2 and 3.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 11, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #300 into stix2.1 will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           stix2.1     #300      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    98.09%   98.09%   +<.01%     
===========================================
  Files          123      123              
  Lines        13417    13425       +8     
===========================================
+ Hits         13161    13169       +8     
  Misses         256      256
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
stix2/test/v21/test_base.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
stix2/base.py 98.84% <100%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 401c9ad...edf465b. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@clenk clenk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@clenk clenk merged commit 08e8b88 into oasis-open:stix2.1 Oct 14, 2019
@emmanvg emmanvg added this to the 1.2.1 milestone Jan 15, 2020
@chisholm chisholm deleted the deterministic_id_unicode_fix branch February 25, 2020 22:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants