Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Storage group (for complex object) test cannot live without children in the link's payload (split V2) #755

Closed
carpawell opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working I4 No visible changes S4 Routine U0 Needs to be resolved immediately

Comments

@carpawell
Copy link
Member

Current Behavior

Storage group is tested in the way (for the complex object):

  1. Put SG
  2. Get SG
  3. Get link object of the split chain
  4. Compare SG's members and the children from the link object's header

Expected Behavior

Children are now in the payload, not the header.

Possible Solution

Collect the children's list starting from the last one (ignore link object)? Learn how to parse link objects in python? Provide some functionality to the neofs-cli about parsing link objects?

Steps to Reproduce

Just run tests.acl.test_storagegroup.TestStorageGroup#test_storagegroup_basic_private_container test.

Context

Split scheme has been changed: nspcc-dev/neofs-node#2716, nspcc-dev/neofs-api#283, nspcc-dev/neofs-spec#97. Not all the tests are ready for that.

@carpawell carpawell added bug Something isn't working U2 Seriously planned labels Mar 21, 2024
@roman-khimov roman-khimov added U0 Needs to be resolved immediately S4 Routine I4 No visible changes and removed U2 Seriously planned labels Mar 22, 2024
@roman-khimov roman-khimov assigned carpawell and unassigned evgeniiz321 Apr 1, 2024
@carpawell
Copy link
Member Author

Closed in #781.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working I4 No visible changes S4 Routine U0 Needs to be resolved immediately
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants