Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/GC big objects parts #2863

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 13, 2024
Merged

Fix/GC big objects parts #2863

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 13, 2024

Conversation

carpawell
Copy link
Member

Closes #2858.

@carpawell carpawell self-assigned this Jun 10, 2024
@carpawell carpawell force-pushed the fix/gc-big-objects-parts branch from f3f4d64 to 2d30e75 Compare June 10, 2024 08:15
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 10, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 38.33333% with 37 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 23.69%. Comparing base (e5da072) to head (31b9074).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Current head 31b9074 differs from pull request most recent head 658cbde

Please upload reports for the commit 658cbde to get more accurate results.

Files Patch % Lines
pkg/services/replicator/process.go 0.00% 15 Missing ⚠️
pkg/local_object_storage/shard/exists.go 0.00% 3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
pkg/local_object_storage/shard/gc.go 42.85% 4 Missing ⚠️
pkg/local_object_storage/shard/shard.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
pkg/services/replicator/replicator.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
pkg/core/object/object.go 66.66% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
pkg/local_object_storage/engine/inhume.go 71.42% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
pkg/local_object_storage/metabase/exists.go 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
cmd/neofs-node/object.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
pkg/core/object/fmt.go 87.50% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2863      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   23.56%   23.69%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files         773      770       -3     
  Lines       44672    44540     -132     
==========================================
+ Hits        10529    10555      +26     
+ Misses      33290    33131     -159     
- Partials      853      854       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@carpawell
Copy link
Member Author

Found corner case in shard distribution, will add tests and fix.

@carpawell carpawell marked this pull request as draft June 10, 2024 10:58
@carpawell carpawell force-pushed the fix/gc-big-objects-parts branch from 2d30e75 to 2705b12 Compare June 10, 2024 22:34
@carpawell
Copy link
Member Author

carpawell commented Jun 10, 2024

OK, a fresh view and an extended test showed that it did not work. Let it be simple and error-proof.

pkg/core/object/object.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/local_object_storage/engine/engine_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/services/replicator/process.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/services/replicator/process.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/services/replicator/process.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/services/replicator/process.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
We have found a deadlock replication cycle; numbers are good things to know in
this case.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <[email protected]>
Closes #2858.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <[email protected]>
Many packages may benefit from it.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <[email protected]>
@carpawell carpawell force-pushed the fix/gc-big-objects-parts branch from 2705b12 to 31b9074 Compare June 11, 2024 16:00
@carpawell carpawell force-pushed the fix/gc-big-objects-parts branch from 31b9074 to 658cbde Compare June 13, 2024 10:45

// Expiration searches for expiration attribute in the object. Returns
// ErrNoExpiration if not found.
func Expiration(obj object.Object) (uint64, error) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need this if we're not touching replicator?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this can be useful in general as i mentioned in the commit, i just had not searched if more places can reused it

@roman-khimov roman-khimov merged commit 690c64d into master Jun 13, 2024
19 of 22 checks passed
@roman-khimov roman-khimov deleted the fix/gc-big-objects-parts branch June 13, 2024 13:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

GC has not collected an expired object
3 participants