You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'm always frustrated when epoch lasts longer than 240 blocks in our networks.
Describe the solution you'd like
If IR is restarted, it should be possible to vote correctly for a new epoch tick. There should not be situations when we waiting for new block timers to tick or when multisignature voting fails.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Wake up, see the actual epoch status, vote (if not yet) based on the last epoch tick block.
Additional context
11.11.2024, mainnet
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
10 is too low value for practice. It is not mind-blowing to receive tens of
notifications per block and, moreover, it was already seen in real networks.
Refs #3007.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <[email protected]>
10 is too low value for practice. It is not mind-blowing to receive tens of
notifications per block and, moreover, it was already seen in real networks.
Refs #3007.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <[email protected]>
10 is too low value for practice. It is not mind-blowing to receive tens of
notifications per block and, moreover, it was already seen in real networks.
Refs #3007.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Karpy <[email protected]>
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I'm always frustrated when epoch lasts longer than 240 blocks in our networks.
Describe the solution you'd like
If IR is restarted, it should be possible to vote correctly for a new epoch tick. There should not be situations when we waiting for new block timers to tick or when multisignature voting fails.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Wake up, see the actual epoch status, vote (if not yet) based on the last epoch tick block.
Additional context
11.11.2024, mainnet
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: