Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 22, 2023. It is now read-only.

Node.js Internationalization Proposal #674

Closed
obensource opened this issue Feb 7, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Node.js Internationalization Proposal #674

obensource opened this issue Feb 7, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@obensource
Copy link
Member

Hi there!

On behalf of the Node.js Community Committee, I’d like to thank you for your group’s contributions to this awesome project! 👏👏👏

I’m reaching out as a member of our new Internationalization Working Group, and we’d like to get in touch with you about our proposal around Internationalization for Node.js!

Our proposed changes would modify the structure of the working model that your group, and all Node.js Localization groups currently observe. The primary difference being that we’d like to introduce a new translation platform to streamline the translation process and setup automated integration of localization into the Node.js project.

If you haven’t seen it already, we’d greatly appreciate if you could please take a moment to review our new proposal and comment in this issue to let us know if you have any thoughts, questions, or objections to it.

We’d love to hear from you by February 14th, during our consensus seeking period for this proposal. If we’re not able to hear from you in that time, we’ll consider that your opinion of the effort is positive, and press on with it.

Moving ahead, the i18n Working Group is so thrilled to stay in touch with you and make the translation of Node.js’ content into your language a success!

We’re excited to be in touch again soon, and thank you for working with us!

@taggon
Copy link
Contributor

taggon commented Feb 12, 2018

Awesome! I'm glad to hear that you've decided to introduce a better localization process. 👍 Thanks!

@obensource
Copy link
Member Author

@taggon Thank you! We're thankful for you positive feedback! Excited to make it happen. 🍻

@taggon
Copy link
Contributor

taggon commented Apr 19, 2018

Hey @obensource ! Is this issue still needed to open? If not, I will close it.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants