-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: minor replace var by const #8621
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Could you update the commit message to reference the specific test?
0336cb9
to
308d155
Compare
@cjihrig changed to test: replace var by const test-tls-zero-clear-in |
CI failures with arm-fanned are unrelated. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
I thought we were against these sort of changes and that they were churn unless they introduce changes that are not changes from |
@benjamingr This is related to nodejs/code-and-learn#56 (comment) I'll start the process of landing this. |
PR-URL: #8621 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ilkka Myller <[email protected]>
Although I don’t have any strong feelings about this: Yes, that was more or less my impression, too. I think the problematic effects are definitely smaller for test files, and overall I’m sorry for not being prepared for the number of attendees and falling back to a more ad-hoc way of distributing first contributions that may have led to some unclarity as to what would be considered a proper change and what not. I do think the value of having gained quite a few people who are now familiar with the contribution process is non-negligible, though.
I’m not sure if @benjamingr’s comment was meant as an objection, but if so, maybe landing this was a bit premature? |
Good point @addaleax. I personally didn't read his comment as an objection to this specific PR (in wider context of other code+learn PRs), but definitely try be more sensitive when evaluating feedbacks in other PRs. Thank you. I've taken up the task of landing these code+learn session contributions and I've tried to be bit more forgiving to new contributors about minor details (commit title wording) and fix those in the landing process. Hopefully thats ok? |
Imho, that is not only ok, that is awesome. 👍 |
PR-URL: #8621 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ilkka Myller <[email protected]>
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test nosign
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test
Description of change