Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tls: check result of SSL_CTX_set_*_proto_version #53459

Merged

Conversation

tniessen
Copy link
Member

These functions generally should not fail, but we also shouldn't ignore potential failures entirely since security properties of the application might depend on successful configuration.

This also is consistent with the existing CHECKs in SetMinProto() and SetMaxProto().

These functions generally should not fail, but we also shouldn't ignore
potential failures entirely since security properties of the application
might depend on successful configuration.

This also is consistent with the existing CHECKs in SetMinProto() and
SetMaxProto().
@tniessen tniessen added tls Issues and PRs related to the tls subsystem. openssl Issues and PRs related to the OpenSSL dependency. labels Jun 14, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/crypto

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. crypto Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Jun 14, 2024
@tniessen tniessen added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jun 15, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jun 15, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@tniessen tniessen added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Jun 15, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@tniessen tniessen added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jun 15, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Jun 16, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 474d2f4 into nodejs:main Jun 16, 2024
73 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 474d2f4

targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
These functions generally should not fail, but we also shouldn't ignore
potential failures entirely since security properties of the application
might depend on successful configuration.

This also is consistent with the existing CHECKs in SetMinProto() and
SetMaxProto().

PR-URL: #53459
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
sophonieb pushed a commit to sophonieb/node that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
These functions generally should not fail, but we also shouldn't ignore
potential failures entirely since security properties of the application
might depend on successful configuration.

This also is consistent with the existing CHECKs in SetMinProto() and
SetMaxProto().

PR-URL: nodejs#53459
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
bmeck pushed a commit to bmeck/node that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2024
These functions generally should not fail, but we also shouldn't ignore
potential failures entirely since security properties of the application
might depend on successful configuration.

This also is consistent with the existing CHECKs in SetMinProto() and
SetMaxProto().

PR-URL: nodejs#53459
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
marco-ippolito pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2024
These functions generally should not fail, but we also shouldn't ignore
potential failures entirely since security properties of the application
might depend on successful configuration.

This also is consistent with the existing CHECKs in SetMinProto() and
SetMaxProto().

PR-URL: #53459
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
marco-ippolito pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2024
These functions generally should not fail, but we also shouldn't ignore
potential failures entirely since security properties of the application
might depend on successful configuration.

This also is consistent with the existing CHECKs in SetMinProto() and
SetMaxProto().

PR-URL: #53459
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. crypto Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. openssl Issues and PRs related to the OpenSSL dependency. tls Issues and PRs related to the tls subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants