-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tools: use sccache Github action #53316
Conversation
Review requested:
|
build times before & after: test-macOS: 45m 5s ⇒ 31m 14s I have no idea why |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Space usage:
node
Public
4.86 GB out of 10 GB • 103632 active caches
Knowing that the cache for the v8-update script uses almost 1GB, we still have some room.
nice |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
amazing
Landed in 001c36b |
PR-URL: #53316 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#53316 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <[email protected]>
PR-URL: nodejs#53316 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #53316 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #53316 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Filip Skokan <[email protected]>
Follow up for #52839
there is a deliberate lint error just to make this run twice for before/after comparison