test: reduce flakiness of test-fs-read-position-validation.mjs
#42999
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
needs-ci
aduh95
reviewed
May 7, 2022
aduh95
reviewed
May 7, 2022
aduh95
reviewed
May 7, 2022
aduh95
reviewed
May 7, 2022
aduh95
reviewed
May 9, 2022
aduh95
approved these changes
May 9, 2022
aduh95
added
author ready
github-actions
bot
removed
the
request-ci
This was referenced May 14, 2022
Merged
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
LiviaMedeiros
force-pushed
the
fs-reads-position-test-segregate
branch
from
523f1b9
to
11a5b35
Compare
aduh95
approved these changes
May 15, 2022
aduh95
added
commit-queue
nodejs-github-bot
removed
the
commit-queue
|
Landed in e330b45 |
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2022
PR-URL: #42999 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
juanarbol
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2022
PR-URL: #42999 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
nodejs-github-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2022
Some platforms may return `EOVERFLOW` errors instead of `EFBIG`. PR-URL: #43510 Refs: #42999 Refs: #43509 Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
F3n67u
pushed a commit
to F3n67u/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2022
Some platforms may return `EOVERFLOW` errors instead of `EFBIG`. PR-URL: nodejs#43510 Refs: nodejs#42999 Refs: nodejs#43509 Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
|
@LiviaMedeiros this breaks tests when landing in v16.x. Do you mind creating a backport PR to v16.x-staging? Thanks |
LiviaMedeiros
added a commit
to LiviaMedeiros/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2022
PR-URL: nodejs#42999 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
LiviaMedeiros
added a commit
to LiviaMedeiros/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2022
PR-URL: nodejs#42999 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
LiviaMedeiros
added a commit
to LiviaMedeiros/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2022
PR-URL: nodejs#42999 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
LiviaMedeiros
added a commit
to LiviaMedeiros/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2022
PR-URL: nodejs#42999 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]> Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#43588
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2022
Some platforms may return `EOVERFLOW` errors instead of `EFBIG`. PR-URL: #43510 Refs: #42999 Refs: #43509 Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2022
PR-URL: #42999 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 20, 2022
Some platforms may return `EOVERFLOW` errors instead of `EFBIG`. PR-URL: #43510 Refs: #42999 Refs: #43509 Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2022
PR-URL: #42999 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2022
Some platforms may return `EOVERFLOW` errors instead of `EFBIG`. PR-URL: #43510 Refs: #42999 Refs: #43509 Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
guangwong
pushed a commit
to noslate-project/node
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2022
PR-URL: nodejs/node#42999 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
guangwong
pushed a commit
to noslate-project/node
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2022
Some platforms may return `EOVERFLOW` errors instead of `EFBIG`. PR-URL: nodejs/node#43510 Refs: nodejs/node#42999 Refs: nodejs/node#43509 Reviewed-By: LiviaMedeiros <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The said test failed randomly several times with
EBADFerror code: [1], [2], [3]This PR should make the test more reliable by promisifying Callback API parts and calling them in sequence.
Additionally, it separates Callback API and Synchronous API parts into two tests, in anticipation of validation in Promises API.