Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: call functions internally #38560

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

VoltrexKeyva
Copy link
Member

All (or at least most) of the tests uses lambdas (or arrow functions if you will) to call these functions internally inside of directly calling them, this should also use this technique for consistency.

All (or at least most) of the tests uses lambdas (or arrow functions if you will) to call these functions internally inside of directly calling them, this should also use this technique for consistency.
@github-actions github-actions bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels May 5, 2021
@jasnell jasnell added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. and removed needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels May 7, 2021
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented May 7, 2021

@jasnell jasnell added the fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. label May 7, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 7, 2021

Fast-track has been requested by @jasnell. Please 👍 to approve.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented May 7, 2021

Landed in 29f1b60

@jasnell jasnell closed this May 7, 2021
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2021
All (or at least most) of the tests uses lambdas (or arrow functions
if you will) to call these functions internally inside of directly
calling them, this should also use this technique for consistency.

PR-URL: #38560
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Zijian Liu <[email protected]>
@VoltrexKeyva VoltrexKeyva deleted the patch-2 branch May 7, 2021 22:27
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2021
All (or at least most) of the tests uses lambdas (or arrow functions
if you will) to call these functions internally inside of directly
calling them, this should also use this technique for consistency.

PR-URL: #38560
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Zijian Liu <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2021
All (or at least most) of the tests uses lambdas (or arrow functions
if you will) to call these functions internally inside of directly
calling them, this should also use this technique for consistency.

PR-URL: #38560
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Zijian Liu <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2021
All (or at least most) of the tests uses lambdas (or arrow functions
if you will) to call these functions internally inside of directly
calling them, this should also use this technique for consistency.

PR-URL: #38560
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Zijian Liu <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2021
All (or at least most) of the tests uses lambdas (or arrow functions
if you will) to call these functions internally inside of directly
calling them, this should also use this technique for consistency.

PR-URL: #38560
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Zijian Liu <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2021
All (or at least most) of the tests uses lambdas (or arrow functions
if you will) to call these functions internally inside of directly
calling them, this should also use this technique for consistency.

PR-URL: #38560
Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Zijian Liu <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants