-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lib: add typings for fileURLToPath #38182
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is it draft?
I feel like we should create a new subsystem for internal typings so that users who read our changelog don't interpret these commits the wrong way. |
I wonder if we could reuse the typings from https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/tree/master/types/node instead of adding JSDoc comments now that we have a |
@aduh95 to some extent, however the public typings and the implementation typings likely serve different purposes for now at least. In particular implementation is about the actual checks for contributors which are not exactly the same as the public typings. I'd check each thing we pull over and see how we would want to pull in the LICENSE file if we do so. |
@targos it is a draft since people wanted to see an example PR for JSDoc and I'm not going to merge it for a bit. Also, I would love a new subsystem for this. |
@@ -1365,6 +1372,10 @@ function getPathFromURLPosix(url) { | |||
return decodeURIComponent(pathname); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
/** | |||
* @param {string | URL} path |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe these need to be wrapped in parentheses:
* @param {(string | URL)} path
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Core is targeting JSDoc support in TypeScript not jsdoc the documentation tool. We could add them, but they are not actually needed. Just be sure to stick with TS support and not break the practical usage of the tags is my thoughts. So don't use jsdoc.org but instead defer to TS
/** | ||
* @param {string | URL} path | ||
* @returns {string} | ||
*/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we document thrown errors using jsdoc's @throws
tag?
This function throws TypeError
in two different circumstances with varying error codes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
from a practical perspective I don't think documenting the thrown errors is too useful since with current tooling it isn't actually able to guard them on a try/catch. In JS , stack depth, out of memory, etc. likely would cause such tags to be incorrect actually.
PR-URL: #38213 Refs: #38182 Refs: https://twitter.com/bradleymeck/status/1380643627211354115 Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #38213 Refs: #38182 Refs: https://twitter.com/bradleymeck/status/1380643627211354115 Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #38213 Refs: #38182 Refs: https://twitter.com/bradleymeck/status/1380643627211354115 Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #38213 Refs: #38182 Refs: https://twitter.com/bradleymeck/status/1380643627211354115 Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
PR-URL: #38213 Refs: #38182 Refs: https://twitter.com/bradleymeck/status/1380643627211354115 Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
This types
internal/url.js
fileURLToPath
.It actually adds a typings to 3 locations:
getPathFromURLWin32
to specify the parameter it takesURL.prototype.pathname
to make inference work on the return type ofgetPathFromURLWin32
fileURLToPath
to specify the parameters it takesI did not actually specify the return types while doing my initial check of these since that would be determined by the implementation details and specifying the return value might not match the implementation. Due to the desire to keep checks turned off by default due to the overall lack of typings at this point in the project. Be sure to enable checks by changing :
node/tsconfig.json
Line 10 in 40ace47
checkJs
totrue
innode/tsconfig.json
and being sure to restart any TS Server you might have running in your IDE to perform checks.After enabling checks I set the expected return types and then validated that there were no errors before changing
checkJs
back tofalse
and pushing out the PR.There are no tests for such typings, but you can show proof of your work by attaching simple images which could then be validated by a reviewer:
*after