Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

async_hooks: avoid unneeded AsyncResource creation #34616

Conversation

Flarna
Copy link
Member

@Flarna Flarna commented Aug 3, 2020

Inspired by the callstack at #34556 (comment)

If the wanted store is equal to the active store it's not needed to create an AsyncResource.

Refs: #34556 (comment)

fyi @vdeturckheim @puzpuzpuz @Qard

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the async_hooks Issues and PRs related to the async hooks subsystem. label Aug 3, 2020
@puzpuzpuz
Copy link
Member

@Flarna there is a conflict in lib/async_hooks.js. Could you resolve it?

Inspired by the callstack at nodejs#34556 (comment)

If the wanted store is equal to the active store it's not needed to
create an AsyncResource.

Refs: nodejs#34556 (comment)
@Flarna Flarna force-pushed the async-local-no-unneeded-resource branch from 048632c to 5eb30aa Compare August 4, 2020 08:08
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/32623/

@Flarna Flarna added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Aug 4, 2020
@Flarna Flarna changed the title [async_hooks] avoid unneeded AsyncResource creation async_hooks: avoid unneeded AsyncResource creation Aug 4, 2020
Flarna added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2020
Inspired by the callstack at #34556 (comment)

If the wanted store is equal to the active store it's not needed to
create an AsyncResource.

Refs: #34556 (comment)

PR-URL: #34616
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Andrey Pechkurov <[email protected]>
@Flarna
Copy link
Member Author

Flarna commented Aug 6, 2020

Landed in 4824988

@Flarna Flarna closed this Aug 6, 2020
@Flarna Flarna deleted the async-local-no-unneeded-resource branch August 6, 2020 21:28
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2020
Inspired by the callstack at #34556 (comment)

If the wanted store is equal to the active store it's not needed to
create an AsyncResource.

Refs: #34556 (comment)

PR-URL: #34616
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Andrey Pechkurov <[email protected]>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Aug 10, 2020
codebytere pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2020
Inspired by the callstack at #34556 (comment)

If the wanted store is equal to the active store it's not needed to
create an AsyncResource.

Refs: #34556 (comment)

PR-URL: #34616
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Andrey Pechkurov <[email protected]>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2020
Inspired by the callstack at #34556 (comment)

If the wanted store is equal to the active store it's not needed to
create an AsyncResource.

Refs: #34556 (comment)

PR-URL: #34616
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Andrey Pechkurov <[email protected]>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Sep 28, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
async_hooks Issues and PRs related to the async hooks subsystem. author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants