-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: move test-child-process-fork-getconnections to parallel #30749
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lundibundi
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2019
jasnell
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2019
jasnell
reviewed
Dec 1, 2019
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ if (process.argv[2] === 'child') { | |||
server.on('listening', function() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: should this be a common.mustCall()
?
BridgeAR
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2019
Change common.PORT to arbitrary port in test-child-process-fork-getconnections to prepare for moving that test from sequential to parallel. PR-URL: nodejs#30749 Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Now that the test uses an open port assigned by the operating system rather than a hardcoded common.PORT, it can be moved to parallel. PR-URL: nodejs#30749 Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Trott
force-pushed
the
parallel-getconnections
branch
from
December 3, 2019 11:37
d6be5d6
to
890d643
Compare
Landed in 415bba7...890d643 |
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2019
Change common.PORT to arbitrary port in test-child-process-fork-getconnections to prepare for moving that test from sequential to parallel. PR-URL: #30749 Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2019
Now that the test uses an open port assigned by the operating system rather than a hardcoded common.PORT, it can be moved to parallel. PR-URL: #30749 Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Merged
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2020
Change common.PORT to arbitrary port in test-child-process-fork-getconnections to prepare for moving that test from sequential to parallel. PR-URL: #30749 Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2020
Now that the test uses an open port assigned by the operating system rather than a hardcoded common.PORT, it can be moved to parallel. PR-URL: #30749 Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2020
Change common.PORT to arbitrary port in test-child-process-fork-getconnections to prepare for moving that test from sequential to parallel. PR-URL: #30749 Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2020
Now that the test uses an open port assigned by the operating system rather than a hardcoded common.PORT, it can be moved to parallel. PR-URL: #30749 Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change the test to use
listen(0)
instead ofcommon.PORT
, then move the test toparallel
. Checked for parallel flakiness withpython3 tools/test.py -j96 --repeat 192 test/parallel/test-child-process-fork-getconnections
.Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes