Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

src: pass along errors from --security-reverts #25466

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

addaleax
Copy link
Member

Pass along errors from Revert() when a security revert
is unknown (which currently applies to all possible values).

Previously, we would unconditionally call exit(), which is
not nice for embedding use cases, and could crash because we
were holding a lock for a mutex in ProcessGlobalArgs() that
would be destroyed by calling exit().

Also, add a regression test that makes sure that the process
exits with the right exit code and not a crash.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

Pass along errors from `Revert()` when a security revert
is unknown (which currently applies to all possible values).

Previously, we would unconditionally call `exit()`, which is
not nice for embedding use cases, and could crash because we
were holding a lock for a mutex in `ProcessGlobalArgs()` that
would be destroyed by calling `exit()`.

Also, add a regression test that makes sure that the process
exits with the right exit code and not a crash.
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@addaleax sadly an error occured when I tried to trigger a build :(

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. label Jan 12, 2019
@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

Copy link
Member

@joyeecheung joyeecheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, though I wonder if it is possible to verify this in the option parser...(and have the revertable CVEs displayed somehow? Maybe in —help?)

@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed the line ending in the test for Windows.

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/20081/

@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

@addaleax addaleax added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Jan 13, 2019
@danbev
Copy link
Contributor

danbev commented Jan 17, 2019

Re-run of failing node-test-commit-arm

@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor

danbev commented Jan 18, 2019

@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

Fresh full CI (:crossed_fingers:): https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/20246/

@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

Landed in 38ab1e9

@addaleax addaleax closed this Jan 22, 2019
@addaleax addaleax deleted the revert-error branch January 22, 2019 21:59
addaleax added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2019
Pass along errors from `Revert()` when a security revert
is unknown (which currently applies to all possible values).

Previously, we would unconditionally call `exit()`, which is
not nice for embedding use cases, and could crash because we
were holding a lock for a mutex in `ProcessGlobalArgs()` that
would be destroyed by calling `exit()`.

Also, add a regression test that makes sure that the process
exits with the right exit code and not a crash.

PR-URL: #25466
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
addaleax added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2019
Pass along errors from `Revert()` when a security revert
is unknown (which currently applies to all possible values).

Previously, we would unconditionally call `exit()`, which is
not nice for embedding use cases, and could crash because we
were holding a lock for a mutex in `ProcessGlobalArgs()` that
would be destroyed by calling `exit()`.

Also, add a regression test that makes sure that the process
exits with the right exit code and not a crash.

PR-URL: #25466
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants