Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: add missing YAML labels #23810

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

doc: add missing YAML labels #23810

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vsemozhetbyt
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Oct 21, 2018
@vsemozhetbyt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Node.js Collaborators, please, add 👍 here if you approve fast-tracking.

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented Oct 21, 2018

There's no way to lint for that, right? We can't tell the difference between a "regular" HTML comment and one that should have YAML?

@refack refack added the fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. label Oct 21, 2018
@vsemozhetbyt
Copy link
Contributor Author

It seems to me we can't, at least in a simple way, without parsing comments.

@vsemozhetbyt
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will land after #23809 to not cause merge conflict there)

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Oct 22, 2018

Landed in 90cd3dd

@jasnell jasnell closed this Oct 22, 2018
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2018
PR-URL: #23810
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2018
PR-URL: #23810
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
@vsemozhetbyt vsemozhetbyt deleted the doc-cli-yaml branch October 22, 2018 20:12
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2018
PR-URL: #23810
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2018
PR-URL: #23810
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2018
PR-URL: #23810
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants