Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: fix assertion order in test-tls-server-verify.js #23549

Conversation

caropinzonsilva
Copy link

@caropinzonsilva caropinzonsilva commented Oct 12, 2018

The arguments of some assertions in the test-tls-server-verify.js were inverted, having the expected value first instead of the actual value. I fixed this order so that it is the same as in the documentation for assertions.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Oct 12, 2018
@targos targos added the code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. label Oct 12, 2018
@addaleax addaleax added tls Issues and PRs related to the tls subsystem. author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. labels Oct 12, 2018
@addaleax
Copy link
Member

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Oct 13, 2018

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Oct 13, 2018

Collaborators, please 👍 here to fast-track.

@Trott Trott added the fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. label Oct 13, 2018
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Oct 13, 2018

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Oct 13, 2018

BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2018
PR-URL: nodejs#23549
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
@danbev
Copy link
Contributor

danbev commented Oct 15, 2018

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor

danbev commented Oct 15, 2018

Landed in b2e133a 🎉

@danbev danbev closed this Oct 15, 2018
danbev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2018
PR-URL: #23549
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2018
PR-URL: #23549
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2018
PR-URL: #23549
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2018
PR-URL: #23549
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2018
PR-URL: #23549
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2018
PR-URL: #23549
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <[email protected]>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. tls Issues and PRs related to the tls subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.